.
Meta is the channel that works: Raindrop's launch pulled a $35 CAC, the summer detour is more than half recovered, and Attention leads the buy. The blocker is the one Johnny named: spend purgatory at $80 to 100K a month, with a $7M+ January run-rate target that needs $250K a month at the same economics. The way out is net-new audiences, and the 14 specs on this page are the first pass at them: built from your named reviews and both calls.






We pulled your active Meta creative and tagged every ad with our PAE engine: persona, angle, format, emotion, against the supplement-category benchmark. Three things jump out, and every one of them is an opening, not a criticism. The account that found winners with Raindrop's founder videos has plenty of room to find the next set.
Your own words from the August 26 call, and how the engagement is built around each one.
The category default is 40% female with a median age of 26, and your fear is an agency that can't detach from it. Our Ad Library pull already proved your point: 75% of the current creative tags as Casual Gym-Goer. Every one of the 14 specs below lives in her world instead, and the persona index keeps it that way permanently.
Non-negotiable on our side too. Attention is on the biweekly call, briefs get built to their account structure (CBO testing versus ASC scaling, ad sets by persona), and the dashboard is shared with Bobby's team from day one. Thirty minutes on their biweekly is exactly how it should run.
The escape from spend purgatory is not more of what works, it is net-new audiences tested cheaply in statics, roughly one net-new concept per $1,000 of spend. When one bites, it gets a full funnel, so the new TAM scales without cannibalizing what already converts. On another account that exact loop took spend from $200K to $1M a month with healthy frequency.
The ramp is now priced below: month one on Starter at $6,000, and the 90-day lock brings Pro to $8,000 a month instead of $9,000 from month two onward. Ninety days lands right where the January run-rate target begins.
The 60/20/20 split you heard on the call: 60% iterating what works, 20% reskinning winners into new formats, 20% testing net-new personas and angles. What makes it work is the index underneath it, and the index is what your account is missing.
Every ad you've ever run gets tagged: persona, sub-persona, angle, emotion, format, product. First job is the graveyard: angles you turned off that were quietly working, the gut-health story from the call. On another account that single re-ignition became the top performers in the account.
The GLP-1 forums, the picky-eater parenting threads, the protein coffee corner of TikTok: scraped weekly and cross-referenced against what your ads already say. The best copy empathizes at the level of the three half-drunk glasses on the bedside table, and that specificity only comes from where your buyers actually talk.
Copy clears a 9-rubric refinement pass (persona fit, angle, emotion, brand compliance, conversion) before anything renders, and every render clears a 10-gate creative grader before you see it. The ad that sells is a standard, not a hope.
The exact offer is in the box below, no ambiguity. The slider and cards underneath show how the staircase extends as spend scales.
Biweekly review with our media team. Attention stays in the seat; we bring the creative-side account playbook and triangulate, exactly the structure Johnny asked for.
Persona-tuned LPs against winning concepts: the GLP-1 page, the protein coffee page, the picky-eater page. Recent comp: roughly 30% CAC reduction from the layer alone.
Done-for-you media buying with a custom MER dashboard and the D2C tab: NCPA, new vs. returning, LTV. On the table if you ever want it; the creative engine works with Attention either way.
The updated proposal you asked for, same week as the call: the Starter ramp on the page, the staircase to $250K a month laid out, and 14 specs already built for her. One reply starts the Slack channel; briefs land the Wednesday after.